Case Background: Tech Innovate Corporation is grappling with the following  knowledge management challenges: Silos of Information: Teams and departments are wor

Assessment Details for Assessment Item 1:

Overview

Assessment tasks				Learning Outcome Mapping
Assessment ID	Assessment Item	When due	Weighting	ULO#	CLO #for BITS
1	KM Strategy Report (Individual)(2000Words)	Session6	30%	1	1,2,3

Case Study: Revolutionizing Knowledge Management at Tech Innovate Corporation Introduction:

Tech Innovate Corporation, aprominent technology company, is facing significant challenges in knowledge management, hindering innovation and growth. This case study explores the current state of knowledge management at Tech Innovate and proposes strategies to overcome these challenges.

 Case Background:

Tech Innovate Corporation is grappling with the following  knowledge management challenges:

Silos of Information:

Teams and departments are working in isolation, limiting the flow of knowledge across the organization.

Lack of Codification Standards:

Knowledge documentation lacks uniformity, making it challenging to retrieve and apply information efficiently.

Limited Knowledge Sharing Culture:

Employees are not actively participating in knowledge-sharing practices, impacting collaboration and innovation.

Technological Barriers:

Out dated technology hampers effective knowledge sharing and collaboration with in the organization.

Questions:

Silos of Information:

Question: How can Tech Innovate identify existing silos of information within the organization and encourage cross-functional knowledge sharing?

Lack of Codification Standards:

Question: What steps can Tech Innovate take to establish standardized codification practices for knowledge documentation, ensuring uniform adoption across the organization?

Limited Knowledge Sharing Culture:

Question: What initiatives can be implemented to foster a culture of knowledge sharing among employees at Tech Innovate?

Technological Barriers:

Question: Conduct an assessment of Tech Innovate’s current technology infrastructure. What upgrades or new tools are recommended to enhance knowledge sharing?

 

Submission Instructions

All submissions are to be submitted through Turnitin. Drop-boxes linked to Turnitin will be setup in Moodle. Assessments not submitted through these drop-boxes will not be considered. Submissions must be made by the end of the session.

The Turnitin similarity score will be used to determine any plagiarism of your submitted assessment. Turnitin will check conference websites,  Journal articles, online resources, and your peer’s submissions for plagiarism. You can see your Turnitin similarity score when you submit our assessments to the appropriate drop-box. If your similarity score is of concern, you can change your assessment and resubmit. However, re- submission is only allowed before the submission due date and time. You cannot make re-submissions after the due date and time have elapsed.

Note: All work is due by the due date and time. Late submissions will be penalized at 20% of the assessment final grade per day, including weekends.

 

Marking Criteria/Rubric

You will be assessed on the following marking criteria/Rubric:

 

Assessment criteria	Exceptional>=80%	Admirable70%–79%	Creditable60%-69%	Acceptable50%-59%	Unsatisfactory<=49
Introduction & Context	Exceptional clarity in	Provides a clear	Adequately	The Introduction is unclear or missing, and there is a lack of context for the case study. Shows a poor understanding of Tech Innovate’s challenges.	No Submission
	introducing the case	Introduction  and	Introduces the case
	Study and setting the	context or the case	study but lacks
	context. Demonstrates	study. Demonstrates  a	Depth in presenting
	a profound	Good understanding	the context.
	Understanding of the	Of Tech Innovate’s	Demonstrates  a
	Challenges faced by	challenges.	Basic understanding
	Tech Innovate.		Of Tech Innovate’s
			challenges.
Identification of Challenges	Thoroughly identifies and articulates all	Identifies and articulates most	Identifies challenges faced by	Fails to identify or poorly articulate the challenges faced by Tech Innovate. Lacks critical analysis and exploration.	No Submission
	Challenges faced by	Challenges faced by	Tech Innovate  but
	Tech Innovate.	Tech Innovate.	Lacks depth in
	Demonstrates	Provides a good	Analysis and
	Insightful analysis and	Analysis and	exploration.
	Exploration of each	Exploration of  the
	challenge.	Majority of
		challenges.
Strategies to Overcome Challenges	Develops highly effective and	Develops effective strategies to	Develops strategies to overcome	Strategies to overcome challenges	No Submission
	Innovative strategies	Overcome challenges.	Challenges but	are ineffective,
	To overcome	Strategies are well-	Lacks depth in	Poorly reasoned, or
	challenges.  Strategies	Reasoned and aligned	Reasoning or	Not aligned with best
	Are well-reasoned,	With best practices.	Alignment with	practices.

 

	practical, and aligned with best practices.		bestpractices.
Overall Cohesiveness & Structure	Demonstrates exceptional	Exhibits have good organization and	Demonstrates basic organization and	Lacks organization and structure.	No Submission
	Organization  and	structure. Transitions	structure.	Transitions  between
	structure. Transitions	Between sections are	Transitions	Sections are a brupt
	Between sections  are	smooth, contributing	Between sections	Or missing, hindering
	seamless, enhancing	To overall coherence.	May lack	Overall coherence.
	Overall coherence.		smoothness,
			Affecting overall
			coherence.
References& Citations	Exceptional use of	Good use of relevant	Adequate use of	Poor use of	No Submission
	Diverse and relevant	references.  Citations	references.	references. Citations
	references.  Citations	Are mostly accurate	Citations may	are inaccurate,
	Are accurate and	And follow the	contain	inconsistent,  or
	Follow prescribed	Prescribed citation	In accuracies  or	absent.
	Citation style	style.	Inconsistencies  in
	consistently.		Following the
			Prescribed citation