Write My Paper Button

NURS 6501 modules case study analysis, discussion posts

Walden University — College of Nursing

Course Code & Title: NURS 6501: Advanced Pathophysiology

Program Level: MSN — Advanced Practice Registered Nursing (APRN)

Pre-requisite: Graduate-level anatomy, physiology, and chemistry or instructor permission

Course Duration: 11 weeks across 8 modules

Required Text: McCance, K. L. & Huether, S. E. Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children (8th ed.). Mosby/Elsevier.

Supplementary Resource: Evolve online resources at https://evolve.elsevier.com (free student registration required)

Assessment Structure: Per module: 1 Discussion Post + 1 Knowledge Check Quiz + 1 Case Study Analysis (all 8 modules)

Midterm Exam: Week 6 — covers Modules 1–4

Final Exam: Week 11 — covers Modules 5–8

File Naming: M[#]Assgn+LastName+FirstInitial.(extension) — e.g., M1AssgnJohnsonA.docx

APA Format: 7th Edition

Academic Year: 2025–2026

NURS 6501: Advanced Pathophysiology — Complete Assignment Brief, All 8 Modules: Case Study Analyses, Discussion Posts & Grading Rubrics

Course Overview

NURS 6501 is the required Advanced Pathophysiology course in the Walden MSN-APRN program. Students apply an in-depth understanding of bio-physiological processes — and deviations from those processes — to develop appropriate treatment plans for patients across the lifespan. The course moves from foundational cellular biology through major organ system disorders, integrating genetic influences, racial and ethnic variables, and patient-specific characteristics into every clinical analysis.

The course is organized into 8 modules spanning 11 weeks. Each module contains a Discussion post, a Knowledge Check quiz, and a 1- to 2-page Case Study Analysis assignment. A Midterm Exam (Modules 1–4) is administered in Week 6. A Final Exam (Modules 5–8) is administered in Week 11. Case study scenarios are assigned by the instructor via Course Announcements on Day 1 of the relevant week.

Formatting Requirement for All Assignments: The Walden College of Nursing requires that all papers include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. Use the Walden Writing Center APA sample paper at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates. File naming: M[#]Assgn+LastName+FirstInitial.(extension).

Official Walden NURS 6501 Discussion Rubric (Used for All Modules — Total: 100 Points)

This rubric applies to all eight module Discussion posts and responses throughout the course.

Criterion Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting (50%) (45–50 pts) Answers all parts of the Discussion question(s) with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge from course readings and current credible sources. Supported by at least 3 current, credible sources. No grammatical or spelling errors; fully adheres to current APA 7. (40–44 pts) Responds to the Discussion question(s); reflective with critical analysis; at least 75% of post has exceptional depth. Supported by at least 3 credible sources. Fully adheres to APA 7 with one or no errors. (35–39 pts) Responds to some of the Discussion question(s). One or two criteria superficially addressed. Lacks full synthesis. Cited with 2 credible sources. May contain more than 2 spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. (0–34 pts) Does not respond adequately. Lacks depth, synthesis, and critical analysis. Contains only 1 or no credible sources. More than 2 spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to APA 7.
Main Post: Timeliness (10%) (10 pts) Posts main post by Day 3. N/A N/A (0 pts) Does not post main post by Day 3.
First Response (17–18%) (17–18 pts) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Supported by at least 2 scholarly sources. Communication is professional and respectful. (15–16 pts) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice. Supported by 2 or more credible sources. Communication is professional. (13–14 pts) Response is on topic and may have some depth. May lack professional communication. Response may lack clear, concise opinions; few or no credible sources cited. (0–12 pts) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Lacks effective professional communication. No credible sources cited.
Second Response (16–17%) (16–17 pts) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Supported by at least 2 scholarly sources. Demonstrates understanding of Learning Objectives. Communication is professional. (14–15 pts) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice. Communication is professional. Supported by 2 or more credible sources. (12–13 pts) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses may lack effective professional communication. Response may lack clear ideas; few or no credible sources cited. (0–11 pts) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Lacks effective professional communication. No credible sources cited.
Participation (5%) (5 pts) Meets requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. N/A N/A (0 pts) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Module 1: Foundational Concepts of Cellular Pathophysiology (Weeks 1–2)

Module 1 is a 2-week module covering Weeks 1 and 2. Students examine fundamental concepts of cellular processes and the alterations that lead to various diseases, evaluate the genetic environment and its impact on disease, and consider patient characteristics — including racial and ethnic variables — that affect physiological functioning.

Key Learning Resources: McCance & Huether, Chapters 1–13; Justiz-Vaillant & Zito (2022) on immediate hypersensitivity reactions; Evolve media for Chapters 3, 7, and 8.

Module 1 Schedule

When What
Days 1–7, Weeks 1 & 2 Review all Learning Resources (McCance & Huether, Chapters 1–13; StatPearls readings; Evolve videos and animations for Chapters 3, 7, and 8).
Week 1, Day 3 Post initial Discussion response to the instructor-assigned cellular processes scenario.
Week 1, Day 6 Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days.
Days 1–7, Week 2 Work on Module 1 Case Study Analysis throughout the week.
Week 2, Day 7 Submit Module 1 Case Study Analysis (M1Assgn).

Week 1 Discussion: Alterations in Cellular Processes

At its core, pathology is the study of disease. Diseases occur for many reasons. But some — such as cystic fibrosis and Parkinson’s disease — occur because of alterations that prevent cells from functioning normally. For the APRN, understanding the signals and symptoms of alterations in cellular processes is a critical step in diagnosis and treatment, and can also help educate patients and guide them through their treatment plans.

To Prepare

By Day 1 of Week 1, you will be assigned to a specific scenario for this Discussion. Please see the Course Announcements section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

By Day 3 of Week 1 — Initial Post

Post an explanation of the disease highlighted in the scenario you were provided. Include the following in your explanation:

  • The role genetics plays in the disease.
  • Why the patient is presenting with the specific symptoms described.
  • The physiologic response to the stimulus presented in the scenario and why you think this response occurred.
  • The cells that are involved in this process.
  • How another characteristic (e.g., gender, ethnicity, age) would change your response.

By Day 6 of Week 1 — Peer Responses (min. 2, on 2 different days)

Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days. Respectfully agree or disagree with your colleague’s assessment and explain your reasoning. Include why their explanations make physiological sense — or why they do not.

Note: You are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Once you click Submit, you cannot delete or edit your post.

Module 1 Assignment: Case Study Analysis (1 to 2 Pages)

An understanding of cells and cell behavior is a critically important component of disease diagnosis and treatment. Genes, the environments in which cell processes operate, the impact of patient characteristics, and racial and ethnic variables all can have an important impact on disease emergence and severity.

To Prepare

By Day 1 of Week 2, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Assignment. Please see the Course Announcements section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.

The Assignment (1- to 2-page Case Study Analysis)

Develop a 1- to 2-page case study analysis in which you:

  • Explain why you think the patient presented the symptoms described.
  • Identify the genes that may be associated with the development of the disease.
  • Explain the process of immunosuppression and the effect it has on body systems.

Save as: M1Assgn+LastName+FirstInitial.(extension). Submit by Day 7 of Week 2.

Module 1 Case Study Analysis Rubric

Criterion Excellent Good Fair Poor Pts
Symptom Explanation Comprehensive explanation of all presenting symptoms; pathophysiological mechanism clearly and accurately described; all aspects of the case addressed. Explanation of most presenting symptoms; mechanism mostly accurate; minor gaps. Explanation of some symptoms; mechanism partially accurate or incomplete. Superficial or missing explanation; inaccurate pathophysiology. 30
Genetic Association Specific genes identified; genetic mechanism explained at the molecular level with accuracy. Genetic associations identified; molecular-level explanation partially complete. Genetic association mentioned but lacks specificity or accuracy. No genetic analysis; incorrect associations stated. 30
Immunosuppression and Systemic Impact Immunosuppression process thoroughly explained; effect on multiple body systems clearly articulated; connection to patient case explicit. Immunosuppression explained; systemic impact addressed for most systems; connection to case present. Immunosuppression mentioned but systemic impact vague or limited to one system. No substantive immunosuppression analysis; systemic impact absent. 25
APA 7, Sources (min. 3), Format, Writing Quality Title page, intro, summary, and references per Walden template; 3+ current credible sources in APA 7; 1–2 pages; no significant errors. Format substantially correct; 3 sources; minor APA errors; 1–2 pages met. Format partially correct; fewer than 3 sources or several APA errors. Format absent or significantly incorrect; no credible sources cited. 15

Total Possible: 100 points

Module 2: Cardiovascular and Respiratory Disorders (Weeks 3–4)

Module 2 is a 2-week module covering Weeks 3 and 4. Students examine fundamental concepts of diseases and disorders that impact the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. The cardiovascular and respiratory systems work in close partnership — a disease in one creates cascading effects in the other. Students analyze alterations in both systems, evaluate racial and ethnic variables, and consider patient characteristics that impact physiological functioning.

Key Learning Resources: McCance & Huether, Chapters 32, 33, 35, 36.

Module 2 Schedule

When What
Days 1–7, Weeks 3 & 4 Review all Learning Resources on cardiovascular and respiratory pathophysiology.
Week 3, Day 3 Post initial Discussion response to the instructor-assigned cardiovascular/respiratory scenario.
Week 3, Day 6 Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days.
Week 3 Knowledge Check Complete Week 3 Knowledge Check: Cardiovascular and Respiratory Disorders.
Week 4, Day 7 Submit Module 2 Case Study Analysis (M2Assgn).

Week 3 Discussion: Alterations in the Cardiovascular and Respiratory Systems

Cardiovascular and respiratory disease and disorders are among the most common reasons for hospital visits and among the leading causes of mortality. For APRNs, the ability to recognize and explain pathophysiological processes in both systems — and the ways they interact — is essential for diagnosis, patient education, and treatment planning.

By Day 3 of Week 3 — Initial Post

You will be assigned to a specific scenario. Post an explanation of the cardiovascular and/or respiratory disorder, including:

  • The cardiovascular and/or cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these processes interact to affect the patient.
  • How another characteristic (e.g., age, gender, comorbidity) would change your explanation.

By Day 6 of Week 3 — Peer Responses (min. 2, on 2 different days)

Agree or disagree with their physiological analysis and support your position. Address whether their explanation of the interaction between the cardiovascular and respiratory systems is physiologically accurate.

Module 2 Assignment: Case Study Analysis (1 to 2 Pages)

The Assignment (1- to 2-page Case Study Analysis)

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

  • The cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these processes interact to affect the patient.

Save as: M2Assgn+LastName+FirstInitial.(extension). Submit by Day 7 of Week 4.

Module 2 Case Study Analysis Rubric

Criterion Excellent Good Fair Poor Pts
Cardiovascular and Cardiopulmonary Pathophysiologic Processes Both cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary processes accurately and completely described; all symptom presentations explained using correct physiological mechanisms. Both processes addressed; one is less completely or accurately described. One process thoroughly addressed; the other superficial or partially inaccurate. Processes not clearly described or physiologically inaccurate. 35
Racial/Ethnic Variables and Physiological Impact Relevant racial/ethnic variables clearly identified; specific physiological impact accurately explained using current evidence. Variables identified; impact addressed but could be more specific or evidence-based. Variables mentioned but impact on physiology vague or missing. No racial/ethnic variables identified or discussed. 25
Systems Interaction Analysis How the cardiovascular and cardiopulmonary processes interact to affect the patient is clearly and accurately analyzed; clinical implications stated. Interaction analyzed; clinical implications partially stated. Interaction mentioned but analysis thin or not clearly patient-specific. No interaction analysis. 25
APA 7, Sources, Format, Writing Quality Walden format complete; 3+ credible sources in APA 7; 1–2 pages; no significant errors. Format substantially correct; 3 sources; minor APA errors. Partially correct; fewer than 3 sources or several APA errors. Format absent; no credible sources cited. 15

Total Possible: 100 points

Module 3: Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Disorders (Weeks 5–6)

Module 3 covers Weeks 5 and 6. Students analyze pathophysiological processes related to gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders. The Midterm Exam is administered in Week 6 and covers Modules 1 through 4. Begin reviewing for the Midterm using the NURS 6501 Midterm Exam Review document in the Learning Resources.

Key Learning Resources: McCance & Huether, Chapters 39–43.

Module 3 Schedule

When What
Days 1–7, Weeks 5 & 6 Review all Learning Resources on GI and hepatobiliary pathophysiology. Begin Midterm Exam preparation.
Week 5, Day 3 Post initial Discussion response to the instructor-assigned GI/hepatobiliary scenario.
Week 5, Day 6 Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days.
Week 5 Knowledge Check Complete Week 5 Knowledge Check: GI and Hepatobiliary Disorders.
Week 6 Complete Midterm Exam (Modules 1–4).
Week 6, Day 7 Submit Module 3 Case Study Analysis (M3Assgn).
Midterm Exam — Week 6: The Midterm Exam covers Modules 1 through 4 (cellular processes, cardiovascular/respiratory, GI/hepatobiliary, and endocrine). Use the NURS 6501 Midterm Exam Review PDF in your Learning Resources. The exam consists of scenario-based multiple-choice questions.

Week 5 Discussion: Alterations in the Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Systems

The gastrointestinal tract is one of the most complex organ systems in the human body. When alterations occur — whether due to infection, autoimmune processes, structural abnormalities, or metabolic dysfunction — the consequences frequently extend beyond the GI system, affecting nutrition, fluid balance, immune function, and systemic metabolic homeostasis.

By Day 3 of Week 5 — Initial Post

You will be assigned to a specific GI or hepatobiliary scenario. Post an explanation of the disorder, including:

  • The gastrointestinal and/or hepatobiliary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these processes interact to affect the patient.
  • How another patient characteristic (e.g., alcohol use history, nutritional status, comorbidity) would change your explanation.

By Day 6 of Week 5 — Peer Responses (min. 2, on 2 different days)

Agree or disagree with your colleague’s pathophysiological explanation. Identify any physiological connections between the GI and hepatobiliary systems they may not have addressed, or explain why their interaction analysis is or is not physiologically accurate.

Module 3 Assignment: Case Study Analysis (1 to 2 Pages)

The Assignment (1- to 2-page Case Study Analysis)

In your Case Study Analysis related to the scenario provided, explain the following:

  • The gastrointestinal and/or hepatobiliary pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these processes interact to affect the patient.

Save as: M3Assgn+LastName+FirstInitial.(extension). Submit by Day 7 of Week 6.

Module 3 Case Study Analysis Rubric

Criterion Excellent Good Fair Poor Pts
GI and Hepatobiliary Pathophysiologic Processes Both GI and hepatobiliary processes accurately described; all presenting symptoms fully explained using correct physiological mechanism. Both addressed; one less completely or accurately described. One thoroughly addressed; the other superficial. Processes not clearly described or inaccurate. 35
Racial/Ethnic Variables Variables identified; specific physiological impact on the disease process accurately explained. Variables identified; impact addressed but could be more specific. Variables mentioned but impact vague. No variables identified or discussed. 25
Systems Interaction Analysis How GI and hepatobiliary processes interact is accurately analyzed; clinical implications stated. Interaction analyzed; implications partially stated. Interaction mentioned but thin or not patient-specific. No interaction analysis. 25
APA 7, Format, Sources, Writing Quality Walden format complete; 3+ credible sources in APA 7; 1–2 pages; no significant errors. Format substantially correct; 3 sources; minor APA errors. Partially correct; fewer than 3 sources or APA errors throughout. Format absent; no credible sources. 15

Total Possible: 100 points

Module 4: Endocrine Disorders (Weeks 6–7)

Module 4 is a 2-week module covering Weeks 6 and 7. Students analyze diseases and disorders that impact the endocrine system. The endocrine system governs hormonal regulation across all major organ systems, and alterations — from hypothyroidism to diabetes to adrenal insufficiency — produce widespread systemic effects. The Discussion post for Module 4 occurs in Week 6, concurrent with the Midterm Exam.

Key Learning Resources: McCance & Huether, Chapters 21–23; Evolve animations for endocrine chapters.

Module 4 Schedule

When What
Days 1–7, Weeks 6 & 7 Review all Learning Resources on endocrine pathophysiology. Complete Midterm Exam in Week 6.
Week 6, Day 3 Post initial Discussion response to the assigned endocrine scenario.
Week 6, Day 6 Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days.
Week 6 Knowledge Check Complete Week 6 Knowledge Check: Concepts of Endocrine Disorders.
Week 7, Day 7 Submit Module 4 Case Study Analysis (M4Assgn).

Week 6 Discussion: Alterations in Endocrine Function

The endocrine system’s reach extends through virtually every tissue and organ in the body. A single gland’s dysfunction — whether it produces too much or too little of a hormone — can disrupt fluid balance, metabolic rate, reproductive function, vascular tone, and immune defense simultaneously. Precision in identifying the hormonal mechanism behind a patient presentation is essential for both diagnosis and treatment planning.

By Day 3 of Week 6 — Initial Post

You will be assigned to a specific endocrine scenario. Post an explanation of the disorder, including:

  • The endocrine pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How the endocrine dysfunction interacts with other body systems to affect the patient.
  • How another patient characteristic (e.g., pregnancy, age, medication use) would change your explanation.

By Day 6 of Week 6 — Peer Responses (min. 2, on 2 different days)

Evaluate whether your colleagues have accurately explained how the hormonal dysfunction produces the patient’s presenting symptoms, and whether the interaction with other body systems is correctly analyzed.

Module 4 Assignment: Case Study Analysis (1 to 2 Pages)

The Assignment (1- to 2-page Case Study Analysis)

  • The endocrine pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these endocrine processes interact with other body systems to affect the patient.

Save as: M4Assgn+LastName+FirstInitial.(extension). Submit by Day 7 of Week 7.

Module 4 Case Study Analysis Rubric

Criterion Excellent Good Fair Poor Pts
Endocrine Pathophysiologic Processes Endocrine disorder and hormonal mechanism accurately and completely described; all presenting symptoms explained using correct physiological pathway. Mechanism mostly accurate; one or two presenting symptoms less fully addressed. Mechanism partially accurate; not all symptoms connected to the endocrine process. Mechanism absent, superficial, or physiologically inaccurate. 35
Racial/Ethnic Variables Variables identified; specific impact on endocrine physiology or disease expression accurately explained. Variables identified; impact addressed but could be more specific or evidence-based. Variables mentioned but impact vague. No variables identified. 25
Interaction with Other Body Systems How the endocrine dysfunction interacts with at least two other body systems is accurately analyzed; clinical implications stated. Interaction with at least one other system addressed; clinical implications partially stated. Interaction mentioned but thin or not patient-specific. No systems interaction analysis. 25
APA 7, Format, Sources, Writing Quality Walden format complete; 3+ credible sources in APA 7; 1–2 pages; no significant errors. Format substantially correct; 3 sources; minor APA errors. Partially correct; fewer than 3 sources or APA errors throughout. Format absent; no credible sources. 15

Total Possible: 100 points

Module 5: Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders (Weeks 7–8)

Module 5 is a 2-week module covering Weeks 7 and 8. Students analyze diseases and disorders that impact the neurological and musculoskeletal systems. Conditions such as stroke, Parkinson’s disease, and multiple sclerosis have significant secondary impacts on musculoskeletal function. Students analyze how these systems interact and how patient characteristics influence disease expression.

Key Learning Resources: McCance & Huether, Chapters 15–17 (neurological) and Chapters 44–47 (musculoskeletal).

Module 5 Schedule

When What
Days 1–7, Weeks 7 & 8 Review all Learning Resources on neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiology.
Week 7, Day 3 Post initial Discussion response to the assigned neurological/musculoskeletal scenario.
Week 7, Day 6 Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days.
Week 7 Knowledge Check Complete Week 7 Knowledge Check: Neurological and Musculoskeletal Disorders.
Week 8, Day 7 Submit Module 5 Case Study Analysis (M5Assgn).

Week 7 Discussion: Alterations in Neurological and Musculoskeletal Function

Neurological and musculoskeletal disorders frequently co-exist. Parkinson’s disease leads to progressive loss of motor control; multiple sclerosis produces demyelination with cascading musculoskeletal consequences; stroke disrupts the motor pathways that govern muscle function. The ability to analyze both the neurological mechanism and its musculoskeletal consequences is essential for holistic patient assessment and care planning.

By Day 3 of Week 7 — Initial Post

  • Both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes that would account for the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these processes interact to affect the patient.
  • How another patient characteristic (e.g., age, prior injury, genetic predisposition) would change your explanation.

By Day 6 of Week 7 — Peer Responses (min. 2, on 2 different days)

Evaluate whether colleagues have accurately identified the neurological mechanism underlying the musculoskeletal presentation. Offer an additional perspective on the systems interaction or a racial/ethnic variable they may not have considered.

Module 5 Assignment: Case Study Analysis (1 to 2 Pages)

The Assignment (1- to 2-page Case Study Analysis)

  • Both the neurological and musculoskeletal pathophysiologic processes that would account for the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these processes interact to affect the patient.

Save as: M5Assgn+LastName+FirstInitial.(extension). Submit by Day 7 of Week 8.

Module 5 Case Study Analysis Rubric

Criterion Excellent Good Fair Poor Pts
Neurological and Musculoskeletal Processes Both processes accurately and completely described; all presenting symptoms explained using correct physiological mechanisms. Both addressed; one less completely or accurately described. One thoroughly addressed; the other superficial. Processes absent or physiologically inaccurate. 35
Racial/Ethnic Variables Variables identified; specific impact on neurological or musculoskeletal physiology accurately explained using current evidence. Variables identified; impact present but could be more specific. Variables mentioned but impact vague. No variables identified. 25
Systems Interaction Analysis How neurological and musculoskeletal processes interact is accurately analyzed; clinical implications explicitly stated. Interaction analyzed; implications partially stated. Interaction mentioned but thin or not patient-specific. No interaction analysis. 25
APA 7, Format, Sources, Writing Quality Walden format complete; 3+ credible sources in APA 7; 1–2 pages; no significant errors. Format substantially correct; 3 sources; minor APA errors. Partially correct; fewer than 3 sources or APA errors throughout. Format absent; no credible sources. 15

Total Possible: 100 points

Module 6: Renal and Urologic Disorders (Week 9)

Module 6 is a 1-week module covering Week 9. Students analyze diseases and disorders that impact the renal and urologic systems. The kidneys maintain fluid, electrolyte, and acid-base balance and serve as major endocrine organs. When renal function is compromised — from acute kidney injury through chronic kidney disease to end-stage renal failure — systemic consequences are profound and often multi-organ in scope.

Key Learning Resources: McCance & Huether, Chapters 37–38.

Module 6 Schedule

When What
Days 1–7, Week 9 Review all Learning Resources on renal and urologic pathophysiology.
Week 9, Day 3 Post initial Discussion response to the assigned renal/urologic scenario.
Week 9, Day 6 Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days.
Week 9 Knowledge Check Complete Week 9 Knowledge Check: Renal and Urologic Disorders.
Week 9, Day 7 Submit Module 6 Case Study Analysis (M6Assgn).

Week 9 Discussion: Alterations in Renal and Urologic Function

The renal system’s critical role in maintaining homeostasis means that alterations in kidney function quickly produce complications throughout the body — fluid overload, electrolyte imbalances, acid-base disturbances, hypertension, anemia, and impaired drug clearance. Recognizing the cascade of systemic consequences that flow from a specific renal pathophysiology is essential for both diagnosis and safe prescribing.

By Day 3 of Week 9 — Initial Post

  • The renal and/or urologic pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these renal processes interact with other body systems to affect the patient.
  • How another patient characteristic (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, medication use) would change your explanation.

By Day 6 of Week 9 — Peer Responses (min. 2, on 2 different days)

Evaluate whether colleagues have accurately explained the renal pathophysiology and its systemic consequences. Identify a variable or systemic interaction they may not have considered, or affirm their analysis with evidence from the Learning Resources.

Module 6 Assignment: Case Study Analysis (1 to 2 Pages)

The Assignment (1- to 2-page Case Study Analysis)

  • The renal and/or urologic pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these renal and urologic processes interact with other body systems to affect the patient.

Save as: M6Assgn+LastName+FirstInitial.(extension). Submit by Day 7 of Week 9.

Module 6 Case Study Analysis Rubric

Criterion Excellent Good Fair Poor Pts
Renal and Urologic Pathophysiologic Processes Pathophysiology accurately and completely described; all presenting symptoms explained using correct mechanisms. Mechanism mostly accurate; one or two symptoms less fully addressed. Mechanism partially accurate; not all symptoms connected to the renal process. Mechanism absent or physiologically inaccurate. 35
Racial/Ethnic Variables Variables identified; specific impact on renal physiology or disease expression accurately explained. Variables identified; impact addressed but could be more specific. Variables mentioned but impact vague. No variables identified. 25
Systemic Interaction Analysis How renal dysfunction interacts with at least two other body systems is accurately analyzed; clinical implications explicitly stated. Interaction with at least one other system addressed; implications partially stated. Interaction mentioned but thin or not patient-specific. No systemic interaction analysis. 25
APA 7, Format, Sources, Writing Quality Walden format complete; 3+ credible sources in APA 7; 1–2 pages; no significant errors. Format substantially correct; 3 sources; minor APA errors. Partially correct; fewer than 3 sources or APA errors throughout. Format absent; no credible sources. 15

Total Possible: 100 points

Module 7: Women’s and Men’s Health, Reproductive, and Hematologic Disorders (Week 10)

Module 7 is a 1-week module covering Week 10. Students analyze diseases and disorders related to women’s and men’s reproductive health and hematologic disorders — from sexually transmitted infections and fertility disorders to hemolytic anemias, coagulation disorders, and gender-specific cancers. Racial and ethnic variables have significant documented influence across all of these conditions.

Key Learning Resources: McCance & Huether, Chapters 24–26 (reproductive) and Chapters 28–30 (hematologic).

Module 7 Schedule

When What
Days 1–7, Week 10 Review all Learning Resources on reproductive and hematologic pathophysiology.
Week 10, Day 3 Post initial Discussion response to the assigned reproductive/hematologic scenario.
Week 10, Day 6 Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days.
Week 10 Knowledge Check Complete Week 10 Knowledge Check: Women’s and Men’s Health, Infections, and Hematologic Disorders.
Week 10, Day 7 Submit Module 7 Case Study Analysis (M7Assgn).

Week 10 Discussion: Alterations in Reproductive and Hematologic Function

Reproductive and hematologic pathophysiology present some of the most nuanced challenges in advanced practice nursing. Conditions such as sickle cell disease, infertility, polycystic ovary syndrome, and testicular or prostate disorders require APRNs to integrate hormonal, genetic, immune, and vascular mechanisms — and to understand how racial, ethnic, and gender variables shape each patient’s disease experience.

By Day 3 of Week 10 — Initial Post

  • The reproductive and/or hematologic pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these processes interact to affect the patient.
  • How gender-specific physiology or another patient characteristic (e.g., genetic background, hormonal status) would change your explanation.

By Day 6 of Week 10 — Peer Responses (min. 2, on 2 different days)

Evaluate whether colleagues have accurately addressed the genetic mechanism, racial/ethnic variable, or systemic interaction. Offer an additional evidence-based perspective where relevant.

Module 7 Assignment: Case Study Analysis (1 to 2 Pages)

The Assignment (1- to 2-page Case Study Analysis)

  • The reproductive and/or hematologic pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these processes interact to affect the patient.

Save as: M7Assgn+LastName+FirstInitial.(extension). Submit by Day 7 of Week 10.

Module 7 Case Study Analysis Rubric

Criterion Excellent Good Fair Poor Pts
Reproductive and/or Hematologic Pathophysiologic Processes Processes accurately and completely described; all presenting symptoms explained using correct physiological and/or genetic mechanisms. Processes mostly accurate; one or two symptoms less fully addressed. Mechanism partially accurate; not all symptoms connected to the stated process. Mechanism absent, superficial, or physiologically inaccurate. 35
Racial/Ethnic Variables Variables identified; specific impact on reproductive or hematologic physiology accurately explained using current evidence. Variables identified; impact addressed but could be more specific. Variables mentioned but impact vague. No variables identified. 25
Interaction and Systemic Impact How reproductive and/or hematologic processes interact with other body systems is accurately analyzed; clinical implications stated. Interaction analyzed; clinical implications partially stated. Interaction mentioned but thin or not patient-specific. No interaction or systemic impact analysis. 25
APA 7, Format, Sources, Writing Quality Walden format complete; 3+ credible sources in APA 7; 1–2 pages; no significant errors. Format substantially correct; 3 sources; minor APA errors. Partially correct; fewer than 3 sources or APA errors throughout. Format absent; no credible sources. 15

Total Possible: 100 points

Module 8: Pediatric Pathophysiology (Week 11)

Module 8 is a 1-week module covering Week 11. Students analyze disease processes specific to pediatric populations. Children are not simply small adults — their organ systems are still developing, their immune responses differ, and their disease processes have distinct mechanisms, presentations, and outcomes compared to adults. The Final Exam covers Modules 5 through 8 and is administered in Week 11.

Key Learning Resources: McCance & Huether, Chapters 48–50.

Module 8 Schedule

When What
Days 1–7, Week 11 Review all Learning Resources on pediatric pathophysiology. Prepare for the Final Exam.
Week 11, Day 3 Post initial Discussion response to the assigned pediatric scenario.
Week 11, Day 6 Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days.
Week 11 Knowledge Check Complete Week 11 Knowledge Check: Pediatrics.
Week 11, Day 7 Submit Module 8 Case Study Analysis (M8Assgn).
Week 11 Final Exam Complete Final Exam (covering Modules 5–8).
Final Exam — Week 11: The Final Exam covers Modules 5 through 8 (neurological/musculoskeletal, renal/urologic, reproductive/hematologic, and pediatric pathophysiology). Prepare using the Learning Resources from each module and the Final Exam Review document. The exam consists of scenario-based multiple-choice questions.

Week 11 Discussion: Alterations in Pediatric Physiology

Pediatric pathophysiology demands a distinct clinical lens. The anatomical and physiological differences between children and adults — immature immune systems, developing airways, proportionally different fluid volumes, and rapidly changing pharmacokinetics — mean that disease presents differently, progresses differently, and responds to treatment differently across pediatric age groups. Applying adult pathophysiological models to pediatric patients without modification is a common source of clinical error for APRNs.

By Day 3 of Week 11 — Initial Post

  • The pediatric pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • How pediatric-specific physiology (e.g., immature immune function, airway anatomy, fluid-to-body-weight ratios, developmental stage) modifies the disease process compared to an adult presentation.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How the child’s specific developmental stage or another patient characteristic would change your explanation.

By Day 6 of Week 11 — Peer Responses (min. 2, on 2 different days)

Evaluate whether colleagues have correctly applied pediatric-specific physiological principles. Identify any adult-model assumptions in their analysis, or affirm the accuracy of their pediatric mechanism description with an additional evidence-based perspective.

Module 8 Assignment: Case Study Analysis (1 to 2 Pages)

The Assignment (1- to 2-page Case Study Analysis)

  • The pediatric pathophysiologic processes that result in the patient presenting these symptoms.
  • How pediatric-specific physiological differences (developmental, immunological, pharmacokinetic) modify the disease process compared to an adult presentation.
  • Any racial/ethnic variables that may impact physiological functioning.
  • How these processes interact to affect the pediatric patient.

Save as: M8Assgn+LastName+FirstInitial.(extension). Submit by Day 7 of Week 11.

Module 8 Case Study Analysis Rubric

Criterion Excellent Good Fair Poor Pts
Pediatric Pathophysiologic Processes Pediatric disease mechanism accurately and completely described; all presenting symptoms explained using correct mechanisms specific to the pediatric patient. Mechanism mostly accurate; one or two symptoms less fully addressed. Mechanism partially accurate; not all symptoms connected to the stated process. Mechanism absent, superficial, or physiologically inaccurate. 30
Pediatric-Specific Physiological Differences Pediatric-specific differences clearly identified and applied; accurate comparison to adult presentation demonstrates understanding of developmental physiology. Differences identified; comparison to adult presentation partially complete. Pediatric differences mentioned but not applied or compared. No pediatric-specific physiological differences addressed. 25
Racial/Ethnic Variables Variables identified; specific impact on pediatric physiology or disease expression accurately explained. Variables identified; impact addressed but could be more specific. Variables mentioned but impact vague. No variables identified. 20
Interaction Analysis How pediatric pathophysiologic processes interact across body systems is accurately analyzed; developmental stage considered. Interaction analyzed; developmental stage partially considered. Interaction mentioned but thin or not pediatric-specific. No interaction analysis. 10
APA 7, Format, Sources, Writing Quality Walden format complete; 3+ credible sources in APA 7; 1–2 pages; no significant errors. Format substantially correct; 3 sources; minor APA errors. Partially correct; fewer than 3 sources or APA errors throughout. Format absent; no credible sources. 15

Total Possible: 100 points

 NURS 6501: Advanced Pathophysiology

Advanced pathophysiology requires more than memorizing disease definitions — it demands that APRNs develop the capacity to trace a clinical presentation back to its cellular and molecular origins and forward to its systemic consequences. McCance and Huether (2019) provide the essential framework for this kind of multi-level analysis, offering a biologic basis for understanding how genetic predispositions, immune alterations, and environmental triggers converge to produce the wide range of disease presentations APRNs encounter across the lifespan. A patient presenting with dyspnea, tachycardia, and peripheral edema requires the APRN to differentiate between left-sided heart failure reducing cardiac output, right-sided failure elevating venous pressure, and a pulmonary condition that has secondarily stressed the right ventricle, because the pathophysiological mechanism determines the treatment (McCance & Huether, 2019). Racial and ethnic variables are not peripheral considerations in this analysis but central ones, since conditions such as hypertensive heart disease, sickle cell disease, and type 2 diabetes carry documented disparities in prevalence, severity, and treatment response across racial and ethnic groups. The APRN who can explain to a patient why they developed a disease, why they are presenting with specific symptoms, and why certain interventions are indicated — rather than simply naming the diagnosis — is the APRN who sustains adherence and builds the therapeutic relationship that advanced practice demands.

Peer-Reviewed References (Harvard / APA 7 Format)

  1. McCance, K. L., & Huether, S. E. (2019). Pathophysiology: The biologic basis for disease in adults and children (8th ed.). Mosby/Elsevier. https://evolve.elsevier.com
  2. Justiz-Vaillant, A. A., & Zito, P. M. (2022). Immediate hypersensitivity reactions. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513315/
  3. Bhatt, D. L., Lopes, R. D., & Harrington, R. A. (2022). Diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes: A review. JAMA327(7), 662–675. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.0358
  4. Braun, L., & Fausto-Sterling, A. (2021). Racial categories in medical practice: How useful are they? PLOS Medicine5(9), e190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0050190
  5. Menni, C., Valdes, A., Ren, B., Graumann, J., Fonville, J. M., & Ahmad, S. (2020). Real-time tracking of self-reported symptoms to predict potential COVID-19. Nature Medicine26(7), 1037–1040. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0916-2
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?