An “evolutionary” approach to force design emphasizes incremental improvements and modifications to existing platforms. A “revolutionary” approach believes in bold investments toward research and development to achieve an exceptional advantage in future scenarios. Considering current and emerging threats, should your naval service pursue an evolutionary or revolutionary approach? In answering, be sure to take a clear position in favor of either the evolutionary or revolutionary approach. In addition, provide an example from naval history to support your answer.
-support and give details
– must be 750 words in length (not counting the title and reference pages).
-attach turn it in report
-Format: 12-point font, Times New Roman, and double-spaced.
– Ensure it has a dedicated introduction, conclusion, and references/citations as required.
-Include footnotes
-other resources:
Center for a New American Security (CNAS), “Special Event: The Future of U.S. Naval Strategy,” YouTube video, 4:11, April 7, 2021, https://youtu.be/OW09kWNHW2E.
Center for Strategic & International Studies, “Delivering on the Future of Submarine Warfare,” YouTube video, 58:50, July 8, 2016, https://youtu.be/yfrrYcphFBo.
U.S. Naval Institute, “Debate on the Future of Aircraft Carriers,” YouTube video, 1:16:12, January 9, 2015, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8sdNU0K1Hg.
The post naval service appeared first on Study Bloom.