Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Financial decision-making OR Making the most of things Option 1: Financial Decision Making A sneaker manufacturer is considering the purchase of one of two machines. The first machine (Machine A) requires an initial investment of 5,000,

Q1. Decision-making in the business simulation game

In this question, you are asked to provide details about your company (Section A), evaluate thedecisionstaken in the game (Section B), and reflect on the decision-makingapproachused by you and your team (Section C)

  1. A) Company Details
  • Provide the name of your company in the business simulation.
  • State your chosen generic competitive strategy.
  • State your chosen market segment(s).
  • Name your distributor(s).
  • Record your company figures for rounds 2 and 8 using the template provided on the module blackboard page. Present the tables side by side.
  1. B) Decision Evaluation(400 words)

Using decision-making concepts taught in the module, discuss one or two decisions you made during the game. Your answer should refer to the figures provided in part A, and include:

  • A clear summary of the initial problem, the potential solutions considered, and the decisions made.
  • The rationale for your decision, including calculations and results.
  • An assessment of whether the decisions addressed the problem, supported by analysis and figures.
  1. C) Reflection(200 words)

Using specific examples from the simulation game, reflect ononeof the following themes:

  • The pros and cons of group and individual decision-making.
  • Group decision-making strategies and approaches
  • The use of rational and other decision-making approaches.
  • How to be a good team member.

Notes

 

  • You will be assessed on your ability to explain and evaluate your decisions using concepts taught in the module, rather than on whether you made the right decisions.
  • For parts A and B, the relevant concepts are cost-volume-profit analysis and investment appraisal.
  • For part C, the relevant concepts are group decision making and decision-making approaches.

Assessment criteria

  • Ability to apply knowledge and skills to new situations – 15 marks
  • Ability to reflect on decision-making choices 10 marks

Q2. Dealing with uncertainty and managing risk

Four students in the module Management Decision Making – Anton, Khalid, James and Samira – have set up a company in the Simulation Game and named it Sneakers4Westminster. The students have different attitudes to risk. Anton is very optimistic and likes taking risks. By contrast, James and Samira are risk averse they rather prepare for the worst, and hope for the best. Khalid considers himself neither an optimist nor a pessimist, but a rational decision-maker.

The four students are considering investing in a marketing campaign to increase sales. The increase in the level of sales will naturally depend on the state of the economy and based on what they have read in the news, they think that there are three possible scenarios: high growth, medium growth, and low growth. They have made some estimates of the increase in sales they may expect under the different scenarios and calculated the contribution to profit or contribution margin corresponding to each level of sales. Their estimated payoffs are shown in the table below.

Payoffs in 000

States of nature

High growth

Medium growth

Low growth

Campaign A

150

25

-100

Campaign B

45

45

0

Campaign C

-10

10

50

  1. A) In this module, we discussed three criteria for making decisions under conditions of uncertainty. Use these criteria to identify the best option for Sneakers4Westminster. Then, calculate the best option using probabilities, assuming a 20% probability for high growth and a 20% probability for medium growth. Include tables and calculations.
  2. B) Using the answers from part A, explain the preferred choices of the four students and discuss your own attitude towards risk, providing examples from decisions made in the business simulation game.
  3. C) A well-known consulting firm, A Consultancy Ltd., has offered to provide more accurate information on the probabilities of economic growth They would produce a report with detailed information and a new set of probabilities for 50,000 A Consultancy Ltd is known to have access to sources in government and industry that enable them to predict states of nature with considerable accuracy. Samira thinks that they should go ahead with the offer, but Khalid is totally opposed to the idea. Can you explain why Khalid is opposed to the idea? Do you agree with them? Explain why and show your calculations.

Assessment criteria

  • Grasp of concepts 12 marks
  • Presentation 3 marks

Q3. Financial decision-making OR Making the most of things

Option 1: Financial Decision Making

A sneaker manufacturer is considering the purchase of one of two machines. The first machine (Machine A) requires an initial investment of 5,000, while the second machine (Machine B) costs 6,400. Both machines are operative for 5 years. The expected payoffs, in , are indicated in the table below.

Expected payoffs,

Period

Machine A

Machine B

Year 1

1,350

1,800

Year 2

1,400

5,000

Year 3

1,850

400

Year 4

2,000

400

Year 5

2,100

400

Complete the following tasks

  1. Calculate the payback period for the two machines. In your answer, include a table in the same format as that provided in the lecture. If the company has a rule of only accepting projects with a 2-year payback, which project should they choose?
  2. Calculate the NPV for the two investments, assuming that the cost of borrowing is 5%. In your answer, use theexactdiscount factors provided on Blackboard, and present your calculations using the same format that was used in the lecture. If the company uses the NPV criteria to choose between the two projects, which one should they choose and why?
  3. What would be your advice if the company decided to use the internal rate of return appraisal method instead? (as a second interest rate use 20%). Please include the IRR formula provided in the module, and the excel tables with all the calculations.
  4. Now the manufacturer has realised their initial information about machine A was not entirely correct. Machine A has a longer lifetime, 6 years instead of 3, but it requires a 570 overhaul in year 4. The operating costs are much higher than anticipated, and the payoffs start on year 3 only. The new estimate for the payoffs are 1,500, 2,500, 1,200, and 1,000. Based on this information, prepare a new payoff table and compare the two investments using an investment evaluation technique that considers the time value of money.

Assessment criteria

  • Grasp of concepts 16 marks
  • Presentation 4 marks

Option 2: Linear programming

A sneaker manufacturer makes two different types of leather trainers, one for runners and the other a fashion trainer for everyday wear. Manufacturing the trainers comprises three key processes: vulcanisation, assembling, and stitching. Trainers also need to be put in boxes before they can be distributed. This is also done mechanically.

The table below shows the number of minutes required for vulcanisation, assembling, stitching and packaging for each pair of sneakers.

Minutes per trainer

Minutes available in the machines

Product

Running trainers

Fashion trainers

Vulcanisation

12

18

240

Stitching

30

45

450

Assembling

20

60

480

Packaging

40

30

480

The unit contribution margin for running sneakers is 4, and for fashion sneakers is 5.

The companys objective is to maximise profit, and they want to know how many trainers of each type they should make each day.

  1. A) Formulate the problem as a linear programming model using A to refer to the number of running trainers, and B to refer to the number of fashion trainers.
  2. B) Solve the problem graphically, indicate the binding constraints in the graph and explain, in your own words, how did you identify the binding constraint using the graph.
  3. C) Confirm the solution using simultaneous equations.
  4. D) Assume that the shadow price for one constraint is 0.05 and for another constraint is 0.001. Are these constraints binding or non-binding? Explain your reasoning.

Assessment criteria

  • Grasp of concepts 16 marks
  • Presentation 4 marks

Q4. Decision trees OR sensitivity analysis

Answer ONE of the following two questions:

Option 1 Decision trees

The company Westminster Sneakers manufactures trainers for marathon runners. It is a small market, but shoes need to be extremely good quality. New companies are entering the market, and Westminster Sneakers has decided it needs to invest more in R &D. There are three possible projects option A, option B, and option C. They have different costs and duration, and the payoffs will depend on the wider economic context. The table below shows the potential returns from each investment (in terms of increased revenue), given three different scenarios related to the state of the economy over the next five years.

Pay-off table: increased revenue (,000s)

Economic growth

Decision

High

Low

Zero

Option A

200

50

50

Option B

90

50

0

Option C

-10

10

50

  1. A)Westminster Sneakers has hired a consulting firm to estimate the probabilities for each state of nature, and based on this information, they want to identify the best option. Given a 20% probability of high growth, and a 60% probability of low growth, determine the best option. Show your calculations.
  2. B)Based on your calculations above, draw a decision tree (you can draw it on paper, take a picture, and add the image to your script. Please ensure that the image is visible to the marker).
  3. C)One of the managers has suggested that if the decision to invest in option A is taken, and if economic growth stagnates, the company should consider a marketing campaign to try to boost sales. The estimated cost of the campaign is 40,000. If successful, the campaign would lead to an increased revenue of 150,000. Still, there is only a 50% chance of this happening. If unsuccessful, the revenue would increase by 50,00.

Using the new information, draw a new decision tree and determine the best option for Westminster.

Assessment criteria

  • Grasp of decision-making concepts 12 marks
  • Presentation 3 marks

Trees and tables should be presented in the same format as that used in the lecture slides.

Option 2: sensitivity analysis

A sneaker manufacturer operating in Southeast Asia produces shoes for men and women. The production process for both models uses leather, textiles and rubber, but different quantities of each, as shown in the table below.

Mens trainers (X)

Womens trainers (Y)

Leather

1

1

Textiles

4

3

Rubber

1

2

There are supply issues for the three components, and daily usage of leather is limited to 50 m, textiles 150 m, and rubber 70 kg. The contribution to profits for mens shoes is 2.5, for women 3.5.

The manufacturer wants to know how many shoes of each type to make, and remembers a technique called linear programming, which they learned at the Management Decision Making module while studying at Westminster University. They have organised the information as a linear programming model, as shown below, but cannot identify the optimum production levels.

Let x be the number of Mens shoes produced each day and y the number of womens shoes produced each day.

Max 2.5 x +3.5 Y

Subject to

X + Y <= 50 (leather constraint)

4x + 3Y <= 150 (textiles constraint)

X + 2 Y <= 70 (rubber constraint)

x, Y>= 0

  1. A) Produce an excel solver sensitivity report. Copy and paste the report into the word document with all your answers.
  2. B) Based on the report you have produced, answer the questions below:
  • How many shoes should the company produce to maximise its profit?
  • Would this solution hold if the unit profit for x increases by 3?
  • What is the shadow price of the constraints?
  • Would it be worth increasing any of the resources used in the manufacturing of the sneakers, and if so, why?

Assessment criteria

Grasp of decision-making concepts 12 marks

Presentation 3 marks

Q5. Sustainability in the sneaker sector (15 marks)

  1. The sneaker sector (500 words)

Discuss the carbon footprint of the sneaker sector (include the following points: overall contribution, what are the main sources of carbon, how can carbon emissions in the sector be reduced). Include the information provided in the module. You should include sources.

  1. Choose ONE of the two options below:

Option 1 – Sneaker companies (250 words)

Provide examples of what sneaker companies (in the real word) are currently doing to be theircarbonemissions. Indicate your sources.

Option 2 – The Business Simulation (250 words)

Discuss the issue ofsustainabilityin the context of the business simulation game. You will not be evaluated on whether you included sustainability considerations in your business plan, but on whether you can provide a logical explanation of what were the benefits and challenge of doing so in the game. This sectiondoes not requirereferences, as the information is from your own company.

Your answers to parts A and B should include qualitative and numerical information.

Assessment criteria

  • Ability to evaluate sustainability issues in an organisational context

Participation in Game 10 marks

A list with points per company will be posted on Blackboard after the end of the game. Please indicate the name of your city market, your company, and how many marks you were awarded based on the ranking of your company in the business simulation game.

LEARNING OUTCOMES ADDRESSED:

L3. Articulate different approaches to decision-making, including rational, behavioural, individual and group decision-making.

L4. Select and apply appropriate quantitative and qualitative techniques in framing, analysing, solving, and evaluating short- and long-term management decisions.

L5. Evaluate environmental and social sustainability challenges relevant to businesses, and incorporate sustainability considerations in decision making.

L6. Appreciate the difficulties that imperfect information, risk, uncertainty, and complexity impose upon decision makers and determine how these difficulties may best be mitigated.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

The assessment criteria and weightings show you what is important in the assessment and how marks are shared across each criterion. When you are completing your assessment remember you need to fulfil the brief and the assessment criteria below.

Weighting

Grasp of decision-making concepts and techniques

35%

Ability to apply knowledge and skills to new situations

25%

Ability to evaluate sustainability issues in an organisational context

15%

Ability to reflect on decision choices while cognisant of different decision-making approaches

10%

Ability to present analysis and recommendations in a clear and well-structured format

15%

The University has arrangements for marking, internal moderation, and external scrutiny. Further information can be found inSection 12of the Handbook of Academic Regulations,westminster.ac.uk/study/current-students/resources/academic-regulations

Grading form MDM 2024-25 assessment 2

Q1 Evaluation of decisions in the simulation game (25 marks)

Marking criteria:Ability to apply knowledge and skills to new situations, and to reflect on decision choices.

An excellent answer meets the following requirements:

  • Provides all the relevant data, in the required format
  • Identifies decisions and explains them clearly
  • Uses decision making concepts and techniques in explaining and/or evaluating decisions
  • Provides qualitative and quantitative information (including calculations and table) relevant to the question.
  • Reflects critically on the decision-making process and decision-making approaches used by the student and the team, demonstrating clear connections between theoretical knowledge and practical implementation.

Q2 – Risk and uncertainty (15 marks)

Marking criteria:Grasp of decision-making concepts and techniques and ability to present analysis and recommendations in a clear and well-structured format

An excellent answer meets the following requirements:

  • The student has identified the correct concept or technique needed for answering the questions and applied it correctly.
  • Calculations are complete and easy to read.
  • Answer to the question and interpretation of results are correct.

Q3 Investment appraisal OR linear programming (20 marks)

Marking criteria:Grasp of decision-making concepts and techniques and ability to present analysis and recommendations in a clear and well-structured format

An excellent answer meets the following requirements:

  • The student has identified the correct concept or technique needed for answering the questions and applied it correctly.
  • Calculations are complete and easy to read.
  • Answer to the question and interpretation of results are correct.
  • Calculations are and tables presented in the format used in the module lecture slides.

Q4 Decision trees or sensitivity analysis (15 marks)

Marking criteria:Grasp of decision-making concepts and techniques and ability to present analysis and recommendations in a clear and well-structured format

An excellent answer meets the following requirements:

  • The student has identified the correct concept or technique needed for answering the questions and applied it correctly.
  • Calculations are complete and easy to read.
  • Answer to the question and interpretation of results are correct.
  • Calculations and tables presented in the format used in the module lecture slides.

Q5 Business and sustainability (15)

Marking criteria:Ability to evaluate sustainability issues in an organisational context

An excellent answer meets the following requirements:

  • Identifies the key sustainability issues relevant to the sector and covered in the module
  • Provides qualitative and quantitative information which is specific and relevant to the question
  • Arguments are logically developed, and professionally presented. References are included in the text and the list of references.
  • Critically evaluates the advantages and challenges of including sustainability in an organisation, using specific examples

The University has arrangements for marking, internal moderation, and external scrutiny. Further information can be found in Section 12 of the Handbook of Academic Regulations.

ANONYMOUS MARKING

Do NOT include your name or student number within the file name or anywhere within your submission. The submission will be subject to anonymous marking.Having logged into blackboardthe system will record your details anonymously and tutors will only see your name after the entire submission has been assessed and provisional marks have been released to all students at the same time.

REFERENCING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ASSESSMENT

Referencing requirements are applicable to the research question only.

Statements, assertions, and ideas made in coursework should be supported by citing relevant sources. Sources cited in the text should be listed at the end of the assignment in a reference list. Any material that you read but do not cite in the report should go into a separate bibliography. Unless explicitly stated otherwise by the module teaching team, allreferencing should be inCite Them Rightreferencing format. If you are not sure about this, the library provides guidance (available via the library website pages):https://libguides.westminster.ac.uk/referencing

THE DEADLINE AND SUBMITTING YOUR COURSEWORK – CHECKS

Unless indicated otherwise, coursework is submitted via Blackboard. Remember to keep the receipt of your submission carefully, for your records.

The deadline for this assessment is indicated in the front cover. Your work should be fully uploadedbefore13:00. The University would treat your submission as late if your work has not been fully uploaded and stored on the server before 13:00. In order to avoid your submission being marked as late, you should upload your work as soon as possible before the deadline and must not wait until or just before the deadline to start uploading your work.

At busy times the coursework submission process may run slowly. To ensure that your submission is not recorded as a late submission, avoid submitting very close to the deadline.

To submit your assignment:

  1. Log on to Blackboard athttp://learning.westminster.ac.uk;
  2. Go to the Blackboard site for this module.
  3. Click on the Assessment area for the module.
  4. Click on the link the name of the submission link for the assignment to submit.
  5. Follow the instructions, ensuring that you have selected the correct file to upload.

PENALTIES FOR LATE SUBMISSION AND ADVICE ABOUT MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES

Any assessment submitted late online will be penalised unless you submit a claim for Mitigating Circumstances (MC) and the claim is accepted by the Registry. Check this page for more information about mitigating circumstances:https://www.westminster.ac.uk/current-students/guides-and-policies/assessment-guidelines/mitigating-circumstances-claims

Coursework submitted late but within 24 hours of the original deadline, will have 10 marks deducted from the original mark to a minimum of the pass mark (40% at undergraduate level, 50% at the postgraduate level). For example, a piece of assessment awarded a mark of 70% would be reduced to 60% as a penalty for late submission. If you submit your coursework more than 24 hours late after the specified deadline you will be given a mark of zero for the work in question unless the Mitigating Circumstances claim has been accepted officially by the Registry.?

If a coursework deadline extension has been granted as a reasonable adjustment approved by Disability Learning Support, and/or a successful Mitigating Circumstances claim, the late submission penalties will be applied to the extended deadline.

If you do not submit an MC claim or if your MC claim is rejected, then your work will be penalised in line with the assessment regulations.

DIFFICULTIES IN SUBMITTING ASSIGNMENTS ON TIME

If you have difficulties for reasons beyond your control (e.g., serious illness, family problems etc.) that prevent you from submitting the assessment, make sure you apply to the Mitigating Circumstances board with evidence to support your claim as soon as possible. Further details can be found on the following URL:https://www.westminster.ac.uk/current-students/guides-and-policies/assessment-guidelines/mitigating-circumstances-claims

If you do not submit the coursework on time log a call via the IT Service Desk that can be found on this webpage:https://servicedesk.westminster.ac.uk/support/home

Please make sure that your message is very specific. The Service Desk will then email you confirmation that you will be able to use as supporting written evidence for your MC claim. You should take screenshots or make short videos that capture the issue, such as the error messages on the screen, as you may use them as supporting written evidence for your MC claim.

ACADEMIC SUPPORT & FEEDBACK ARRANGEMENTS

Formative feedback

Formative feedback opportunities within this module will occur duringeach seminar and workshop, allowing you to understand your level of understanding and the reading and practical exercises that you should undertake to improve your understanding of the content being discussed that week.

For assessment two, most feedback will be given during theworkshop sessions. During the workshops there are tasks that have been designed to help you answer some of the coursework questions and you can complete them in class with tutor support. There will also be an opportunity to collate your company information and plan your answer to question one during the workshops.

For each assessment, there will be an opportunity to participate in an academic support and feedback drop-in session.

Its important to note that while we cannot verify the accuracy of your responses, we are available to assist you in evaluating the quality of your intended submission. This includes checking that you have addressed the posed question, provided sufficient detail, and adhered to the appropriate presentation standards.

Summative feedback

Summative feedback will be provided via Blackboard and will be based on the assessment criteria indicated in this brief. For quantitative questions, we will indicate on the script whether the calculations and techniques used were correct. This feedback is to help you not only to understand how you performed in the assessment, but it will also provide guidance into how you can improve your academic skills for Assessment 2 and assessments in other modules within your course.

We aim to provide you this feedback online within 15 working days.

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY

ACADEMIC INTEGRITY

What you submit for assessment must be your own current work.It will automatically be scanned through a text-matching system to check for possible plagiarism.

Do not reuse material from other assessments that you may have completed on other modules. Collusion with other students (except when working in groups), recycling previous assignments (unless this is explicitly allowed by the module leader) and/or plagiarism (copying) of other sources including Generative AI (unless allowed within the module), all are offences and are dealt with accordingly. Please see the detailed guidance onAcademic misconduct.?If you are not sure about this, then speak to your module leader.