Write My Paper Button

Case Study Analysis: You can choose a case study,from the provided list, that describes a business scenario involving governance and risk issues from the last 5 years Journals or conferences paper.

Individual Assignment Guidelines and Specifications

 Objectives:- This assessment item relates to the unit learning outcomes as in the unit descriptor. This assessment is designed to improve student learning skills and to give students experience in researching literature on a topic relevant to the Unit of Study subject matter,critically analyzing current academic papers then presenting idea or questions and expected outcomes with clarity and definition in a referenced.

written report.

Objectives:

  1. To enhance your ability to analyse governance frameworks within an organizational context.
  2. To develop practical risk management strategies using industry-standard methodologies.
  3. To critically evaluate the impact of governance and risk management on information systems operations.

Assignment Details:

Case Study Analysis: You can choose a case study,from the provided list, that describes a business scenario involving governance and risk issues from the last 5 years Journals or conferences paper. Carefully read and analyse the case to understand the underlying governance challenges and risks.

Governance Framework Assessment:

  1. Prepare a Governance Framework using one of the appropriate IS Governance frameworks (e.g., COBIT, ITIL, ISO/IEC 38500).
  2. Analysis: Critically assess the prepared framework’s ability to address the governance challenges identified in the case study.
  3. Implementation Plan: Propose a plan for implementing the framework within the organization, including key roles, responsibilities, and processes.

Risk Management Strategy:

  1. Risk Identification: Identify the key risks associated with the IS operations described in the case study.
  2. Risk Assessment: Evaluate the likelihood and impact of these risks using a recognized risk assessment methodology.
  3. Mitigation Plan: Develop a risk mitigation plan that includes preventive, detective, and corrective controls.

Expected Outcomes:

Discuss the expected outcomes of implementing your governance and risk management strategies, including potential benefits, challenges, and impacts on organizational performance.

Key Elements of the Assessment:

  1. Introduction: Provide a synopsis of the case study and explain the background on the governance and risk issues, including an identification of gaps in the current approach.
  2. Governance Framework: Prepare a governance framework, including its strengths, weaknesses, and applicability to the case study.
  3. Risk Management: Present a comprehensive risk management strategy, detailing the identification, assessment, and mitigation of risks.
  4. Implementation: Discuss the practical steps for implementing your governance and risk management strategies within the organization.
  5. Conclusion: Summarize your findings and suggest areas for further improvement of the governance framework and Risk Management framework.

Marking Scheme:

Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Unsatisfactory

Introduction

Weight 20.00%

80.00 to 100.00 %

Introduction is very clear and easy to follow with strong arguments

60.00 to 79.00 %

Mostly consistent logical and convincing introduction.

40.00 to 59.00 %

Adequately consistent, logical and convincing introduction.

0.00 to 39.00 %

Vague or incomplete introduction.

Selection of articles

Weight 20.00%

80.00 to 100.00 %

High quality 10 articles that are very suitable for the topic has been selected.

60.00 to 79.00 %

10 articles that are very suitable for the topic has been selected.

40.00 to 59.00 %

Some articles that are related have been chosen, with some of the articles are not relevant or outdated.

0.00 to 39.00 %

Incomplete submission or mostly irrelevant articles.

Discussion

Weight 40.00%

80.00 to 100.00 %

Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately

60.00 to 79.00 %

Demonstrated ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately

40.00 to 59.00 %

Demonstrated ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately

0.00 to 39.00 %

Did not demonstrate ability to think critically and did not source reference material appropriately

Conclusion

Weight 10.00%

80.00 to 100.00 %

Assessed critically in depth and suggested excellent conclusion logically and presented in very convincing manner

60.00 to 79.00 %

Assessed well and suggested conclusion logically and presented in well manner

40.00 to 59.00 %

Assessed and suggested an adequate conclusion.

0.00 to 39.00 %

Conclusion is confused and disjointed.

Adapted Harvard Referencing

Weight 10.00%

80.00 to 100.00 %

Clear styles with excellent source of references.

60.00 to 79.00 %

Generally good referencing style

40.00 to 59.00 %

Sometimes clear referencing style

0.00 to 39.00 %

Lacks consistency with many errors

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, how can I help?