Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Identify the chosen therapeutic intervention (e.g., Trauma-Focused CBT, Narrative Therapy, Play Therapy, Solution-Focused Brief Therapy, etc.). Link the intervention to relevant theories and models of practice.

Assessment Brief 

Part 1 (1.5, 1.15, 2.1, 2.3, 2.17, 3.1, 3.3, 4.4, 5.1, 5.9, 5.10, 5.14, 5.16, 5.19):

Students are required to develop a case study informed by their practice placement experiences. Students must select an individual service user case, then apply and justify a therapeutic approach based on their learning acquired during the module. The analysis should incorporate theory, ethics, supervision, and professional reflective practice, aligning with the Standards of Proficiency for Social Care Workers as outlined by the Social Care Workers Registration Board.

The Assignment Should Cover the following Key Areas:

Organisational Context (Minimum 300 words)

  • Describe the setting in which the social care intervention would take place (e.g., residential care, community-based services, family support, mental health services, etc.).
  • Identify the target population and the specific needs regarding relevant research of service users within this context.
  • Discuss relevant policies, frameworks, and legislation guiding social care work in this setting.

Genogram of the Person Involved (Minimum 250 words, including visual representation)

  • Create a genogram to visually represent the service user’s family and social relationships.
  • Analyse how familial and social dynamics influence the service user’s experience and therapeutic needs.

Therapeutic Intervention Approach (Minimum 700 words)

  • Identify the chosen therapeutic intervention (e.g., Trauma-Focused CBT, Narrative Therapy, Play Therapy, Solution-Focused Brief Therapy, etc.). Link the intervention to relevant theories and models of practice.
  • Justify the selection of this intervention in relation to the needs of the service user.
  • Review recent literature and evidence-based research supporting the use of the chosen therapeutic approach.
  • Discuss the efficacy and limitations of the intervention.
  • Compare and contrast findings from different sources to support the application of the approach in social care settings. 

Implementation of the Approach: Techniques and Skills (Minimum 400 words)

  • Planning: Explain how you would plan the chosen therapeutic approach in practice.
  • Implementation: Detail specific techniques and skills required (e.g., active listening, cognitive restructuring, creative expression, motivational interviewing, etc.).
  • Evaluation: Discuss how the intervention aligns with evidence-informed practice in social care.

Expected Outcomes (Minimum 250 words)

  • Outline the short-term and long-term goals of the intervention.
  • Describe indicators of positive change and how progress will be assessed.
  • Discuss how the intervention contributes to service user empowerment and well-being.

Need plagiarism-free Answers for your college/ university Assignments

Order Non-Plagiarised Assignment

Ethical Issues Arising for the Service User and Social Care Worker (Minimum 850 words)

  • Identify ethical considerations relevant to the case study (e.g., informed consent, confidentiality, dual relationships, power dynamics, etc.).
  • Reflect on these challenges for the social care worker in implementing the intervention.
  • Discuss strategies to address these challenges while maintaining professional boundaries and effective engagement.
  • Discuss how supervision and continuous learning, and development in therapeutic practice will be used in line with professional standards and codes of ethics.

Reflections on the Writing Process (Minimum 250 words)

  • What aspects of the assignment were most engaging and informative?
  • What aspects would you approach differently in the future?
  • What challenges did you encounter in writing this assignment?
  • How has the assignment influenced your understanding of therapeutic interventions in social care?

Written Assignment

The Requirements for the written assignment are as follows:

  • 12 Font (Times New Roman).
  • Line spacing 1.5.
  • Make sure page numbers are included throughout.
  • It is essential that this assignment follows Harvard UL Referencing. Please refer to the Harvard Referencing Guidelines found here.
  • Ensure that you follow the appropriate academic tone. Avoid the use of personal pronouns. A guide to academic writing can be found here.
  • Your assignment should be underpinned by good quality, relevant and current literature.

Grading Rubric for Assignment 1 (80%)

Criteria Excellent (85%–100%) Very Good (70%–84%) Good (55%–69%) Satisfactory (40%–54%) Fail (0%–39%) Marks Available Marks Given
Organisational Context Demonstrates exceptional understanding of the setting, target population, and relevant policies/frameworks. In-depth research and critical engagement. Provides strong analysis of the setting, population, and policies with good depth and structure. Adequate discussion but lacks depth or specific details. Some missing references. Limited engagement with the setting and policies. Lacks clarity or detail. Vague or inaccurate description with minimal or no references. 10  
Genogram and Analysis Detailed and accurate genogram with deep analysis of familial and social dynamics influencing the service user. Well-developed genogram and good analysis of family/social factors. Adequate genogram with some analysis, but lacking depth. Genogram included but with limited or unclear analysis. Genogram missing or insufficient analysis provided. 10  
Therapeutic Intervention Approach Clearly identifies and justifies the selected approach with exceptional theoretical and research integration. Strong comparisons of different models. Very good justification and integration of theory and research. Some comparisons. Adequate justification with some theoretical support but lacking in-depth research. Limited justification with minimal theoretical or research support. No justification or theoretical basis provided. 15  
Implementation of the Approach Exceptionally well-structured plan, with detailed techniques and evaluation measures based on best practices. Clear and structured implementation plan with appropriate techniques and skills. Adequate planning with some techniques and evaluation but lacking depth. Limited planning and unclear application of techniques. No clear plan or application of intervention techniques. 10  
Expected Outcomes Clearly defined, realistic goals with well-structured indicators for measuring progress and empowerment. Good outline of goals and expected outcomes with some measurable indicators. Adequate discussion of outcomes, but lacks measurable indicators. Limited discussion of outcomes, vague or unrealistic goals. No clear outcomes or goals were provided.