Policy Memo #2: Bail Reform Proposal (Module 5)
This assignment requires students to critically examine constitutional principles, legal precedents, and empirical research on pretrial detention, focusing on the balance between public safety, individual rights, and judicial discretion.
Memo Requirements & Structure
Background and Legal Context
Identify a state or federal rule of criminal procedure that governs pretrial detention and bail practices.
Explain the legal framework and procedural requirements of the selected rule, including any discretionary authority granted to judges.
Summarize the key issues in United States v. Salerno (1987), demonstrating an understanding of the constitutional parameters surrounding pretrial detention, including due process (Fifth Amendment) and excessive bail protections (Eighth Amendment).
Analysis of Current Issues
Provide a critical analysis of pretrial detention policies, addressing:
- The effectiveness and fairness of cash bail systems.
- The role of risk assessment tools in determining pretrial release conditions.
- Disparities in pretrial detention outcomes based on race, socioeconomic status, and legal representation.
- Assess the impact of risk assessment algorithms, evaluating their effectiveness, biases, and ethical considerations.
- Integrate empirical research by incorporating findings from at least three (3) peer-reviewed sources that examine the outcomes of pretrial detention policies and bail reform efforts.
Policy Recommendations
Propose specific, evidence-based reforms to address issues in pretrial detention and bail practices. Recommendations may include:
- Eliminating or reducing reliance on cash bail to minimize socioeconomic disparities.
- Implementing judicial guidelines for risk assessments to prevent bias and ensure fairness.
Concept Map
Incorporate a visual representation of a concept map or logic model to clarify your policy’s structure, actors, and outcomes. Your visual representation may be in text or included in an appendix.