SOCW (2139) Entrepreneurial Thinking and Behaviour L4 Assignment Remit 2025/26 | UCB
| Academic Year | 2025-26 |
|---|
SOCW(2139) 2025/26 ASSIGNMENT REMIT
| Programme Title | BA/FdA Business Enterprise | |||
| Module Title | Entrepreneurial Thinking and Behaviour | |||
| Module Code | 2139 | |||
| ASSIGNMENT TITLE | Entrepreneurial Process (Reflection) | |||
| Original or Resit assessment | Original | |||
| Level | 4 | |||
| Weighting | 50% | |||
| Lecturers | Chatterton, S; Mcluskie, P; Saranchuk, M; Shand, P; Zaman, MB | |||
| W/C Hand Out Date | 29/09/2025 | |||
| Due Date | 15/01/2026 | |||
| Cut-off Date for Late Submissions Original assessment period – 10 working days after the due date | 29/01/26 | |||
| Feedback Post Date | 12/02/2026 | |||
| ASSIGNMENT FORMAT | FILE UPLOAD (DOCUMENT) | |||
| Essay/Report Format | Other (please state in “Assignment Task” below | |||
| Assignment Word Count limit (if relevant) | 1000 | |||
| Page limit (if relevant) | N/A | |||
| Submission Format | e-submission | Individual | ||
| Permitted use of Artificial Intelligence within this assessment | How will AI be used?Only as specified within the Using AI Ethically within Assessments document belowUsing AI Ethically within Assignments document.A Deputy Dean of School must approve all assessments which include GenAI. | |||
ASSIGNMENT TASK:
- Having completed your pitch (Assignment 1) you will write a Personal Development Action Plan based on your experience utilising Jasper (2013) ERA (Experience, Reflection, Action) model of reflection and recommend three priority areas to further develop your skills and attributes based on your presentation skills.
- There will be a template provided that will suggest an appropriate structure on how to write the personal development action plan.
MARKING CRITERIA:
- Below are the marking criteria that align with both the task(s) set and the quality of your document. Clear weightings/marks will be noted for each criterion.
- The overall mark awarded for this assignment will explicitly show how the mark was calculated based on your performance against each criterion.
- Utilising Jasper (2013) ERA reflective cycle to reflect upon the presentation or your ability as an entrepreneur (attributes). (30%)
- Proposed three practical recommendations on how to enhance these based on the reflection and conclusions. (60% in total, 20% per area)
- Show a wide range of reading and evidence of engaging with key texts to support your work. (10%)
TASK AND DOCUMENT FORMAT GUIDANCE:
- Focus on attention to detail, quality of work and overall academic standards.
Specific Guidance for this assignment - This personal development action plan is self-reflective and you should reflect using the Jasper (2013) ERA reflective model.
- Having reflected you are required to identify three areas to enhance your future development and having identified the areas how are you going to improve them (these recommendations should be practical and specific).
- When proposing practical recommendations these should be fully researched and based on the reflection and conclusions. These should come from actual and specific external sources but should be practical for areas they are addressing, fully supported by external URL links.
- For additional guidance on this assignment, please access the assignment vodcast available on Canvas.
LEARNING OUTCOMES:
- Learning Outcomes are what the student needs to demonstrate after completing a module. An assessment is a way in which students can demonstrate their achievement of these Learning Outcomes. Learning Outcomes are NOT the same as the assignment task.
- LO2 To appraise and reflect upon personal entrepreneurial thinking and behaviours
Are You Looking The Solution of SOCW (2139) Entrepreneurial Thinking and Behaviour Assignment?
Order Non Plagiarized Assignment
ACADEMIC SKILLS OUTCOMES:
- The Academic Skills Outcomes to be developed by completing this assignment can be found here.
- For Apprenticeship programmes, identify the applicable Knowledge, Skills and Behaviours the assignment seeks to test.
GENERAL ASSIGNMENT GUIDANCE:
|
UCB standards for presenting your written work |
Please use the standards within this link about text size, line spacing, margins, headers, page numbering, embedding quotations within your work and appendices. Main headings – Arial, size 14, bold, centred Sub-headings – Arial, size 12, bold, left-aligned Main text – Arial, size 12, left-aligned Margins – 2.5cm on all sides Spacing – 1.5 line spacing Between paragraphs – leave one line space between paragraphs Reference list – use single spacing. Leave one space between each reference Paper Size A4 (unless otherwise stated) Tables – label numerically in order of when they are presented in the assessment. Table 1, Table 2 etc. Charts/Graphs – label as Figure 1, Figure 2, etc Labels should be centred directly above the Table/Figure in Arial, size 12. |
|
Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) ethically within your assessments |
Please read the information below on how to use AI ethically within your assignments, including Grammarly. Please ask your lecturer or CASE if you are unclear about any information within this link. If a marker has questions about how you have used AI within your assignment, you may be invited to a meeting to discuss your work. |
|
Teamwork Assessment |
Should this assignment require you to work as part of a team, you will receive an individual grade based on your performance and personalised feedback. The assignment brief will provide clear details on how your individual grade and feedback will be determined against the task and marking criteria. |
|
Importance of Word Count |
Assignment word counts should always be observed. Ignoring a word count significantly increases the risk of your work losing marks because it will likely lack focus and clarity, and/or you would have gained an unfair advantage over others who have completed their work within the word count. Students will be required to state their word count on all submissions. A 10% leeway will be allowed, so the maximum a student should submit will be the word count + 10%. The word count will exclude: o The title page o The contents page o Models, graphs, calculations, data tables, and other exhibited figures or images o Lists of references o Appendices (these should be kept to a minimum) |
|
Page limits in some assessments |
For some projects/assessments, a page limit may be set to encourage you to focus on the most critical information. This is particularly important in projects that involve multiple elements such as tables, graphs, diagrams, calculations or extensive coding, where purposeful information is key. |
|
E-submission |
See the guidance below on e-submitting your assignment: Assessment issues | University College Birmingham |
|
Cut-off date for late submissions (including for students with ECs and/or Support Plans) |
The cut-off time for late submissions is as follows: Original assessment period – 10 working days after the due date Resit assessment period – 24 hours after the due date. After this time, you cannot submit any late assessments, even if you have Extenuating Circumstances to cover them. Students with Support Plans may have additional time to submit their work after the formal submission date for the original assignments only. During the Resit assessment period, the maximum cut-off time for late submissions is 24 hours, regardless of whether a student has a support plan or extenuating circumstances. If things go wrong | University College Birmingham (See Additional Information Section, ‘Assignments and how to Submit them’) |
|
Generic Grading Criteria |
The Generic Grading Criteria (GCC) are the generic features and expectations of work at a given level on your programme. The GCC per level is used in conjunction with the assignment marking criteria to determine the mark for your assignment. For more information on the GCCs for Levels 4-7, please click on this link: Assessment fairness and marking | University College Birmingham |
|
Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct |
Please read the policy on Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct below. UCB will be robust in ensuring that marks awarded for assignments are based on fair and ethical assessment and referencing practices by students. Plagiarism | University College Birmingham |
|
Extenuating Circumstances |
Extenuating Circumstances (ECs) are significant personal difficulties which adversely impact your ability to complete your assignment. Please read the supporting information below if you have ECs impacting your ability to complete this assignment. If things go wrong | University College Birmingham |
|
UCB Referencing Guide |
You are required to reference your sources within your assignments appropriately. Please click on the link below to learn how to reference various sources of information. This Guide also includes how to acknowledge all Generative AI used within your assignment, ensuring that you comply with the Using AI Ethically within your Assignments policy (as covered above). ucbirmingham instructure |
|
Access the Assignment Life Cycle |
The Assignment Life Cycle offers you additional support at each stage of the assignment process |